I am progressing with the sale of my home in Epping and the EA has just e-mailed to warn that the purchasers are appointing a new property lawyer. The excuse is that the mortgage company will only engage with property lawyers on their approved list. On what basis would a big named mortgage company only work with specific solicitors rather the firm that they want to appoint for their conveyancing in Epping ?
UK lenders have always had panels of law firms they are content to work with, but in the past few years big names such as Santander, have reviewed and reduced their conveyancing panel– in some cases removing conveyancing firms who have represented them for over 25 years.
Lending institutions point to the increase in fraud by way of justification for the reduction – criteria have been narrowed as a smaller panel is easier to oversee. No lender will say how many solicitors have been dropped, claiming the information is commercially sensitive, but the Law Society says it is being contacted daily by practices that have been removed from panels. Some do not even realise they have been dropped until contacted by a borrower who has instructed them as might be the situation in your buyers' case. The purchasers are unlikely to have any impact on this.
Is there a list of TSB panel solicitors in Epping on the Council of Mortgage Lender’s Website?
Unfortunately not yet. There is no such facility on the CML or Building Society Association sites. Very few mortgage companies make their panel listings available on the web. Where you are in need of a Epping lawyer on the TSB please make the most of our facility.
Is it the case that all Epping solicitors on the Leeds Building Society conveyancing panel are regulated by the SRA?
As a firm of solicitors, in order to be on the Leeds Building Society conveyancing panel they would need to be overseen by the SRA. Some lenders do list licenced conveyancers on their panel in which case such organisation would be overseen by the Council of Licensed Conveyancers.
I recently had an offer accepted on a house in Epping. My mortgage broker pressured me to appoint their conveyancing practitioner. I paid an upfront payment of £150. Soon after, the conveyancer contacted me to say that they were not on the Lloyds conveyancing panel. Am I right in thinking that I should be due a refund?
You should be able to recover this from the law firm if they were not on the Lloyds panel. They should have asked at the outset which lender you were obtaining a mortgage with. An important lesson to readers of this site is to check that the lawyers are on the appropriate lender panel.
What makes your site different to other web based conveyancing brokers when it comes to conveyancing in Epping?
At this site receive an accurate costs illustration from a Solicitor or Licensed Conveyancer that has a full understanding of the nuances for your conveyancing in Epping. Unlike many estate agents and brokerage sites we are not in the business of charging firms a fee if you appoint them for your conveyancing in Epping
My husband and I are FTB’s - agreed a price, but the agent told us that the owners will only issue a contract if we use the agent's recommended conveyancers as they are insisting on an ‘expedited deal’. We would rather use a family conveyancer who is familiar with conveyancing in Epping
It is highly unlikely the owners are driving this. Should the seller desire ‘a quick sale', taking such a hostile approach to a motivated purchaser is going to damage their objectives. Speak to the vendors direct and make sure they comprehend that (a)you are keen to buy (b)you are ready to progress, with finances in place © you do not need to sell (d) you intend to proceed fast (e)however you will continue to appoint your preferred Epping conveyancing lawyers - not the ones that will provide their negotiator at the agency a referral fee or meet his conveyancing targets set by senior management.
Last March I purchased a leasehold flat in Epping. Do I have any liability for service charges relating to a period prior to my ownership?
In a situation where the service charge has already been demanded from the previous lessee and they have not paid you would not usually be personally liable for the arrears. However, your landlord may still be able to take action to forfeit the lease. It is an essential part of leasehold conveyancing for your conveyancer to ensure to have an up to date clear service charge receipt before completion of your purchase. If you have a mortgage this is likely to be a requirement of your lender.
If you purchase part way through an accounting year you may be liable for charges not yet demanded even if they relate to a period prior to your purchase. In such circumstances your conveyancer would normally arrange for the seller to set aside some money to cover their part of the period (usually called a service charge retention).
Epping Leasehold Conveyancing - Sample of Questions you should consider Prior to Purchasing
-
Does the lease have onerous restrictions? It is important to be aware whether a new roof is being installed or some other major work is due in the foreseeable future that will be shared between the leaseholders and could well materially impact the level of the maintenance costs or require a one time invoice. Are any of leasehold owners in arrears of their service charge liability?
The property lawyers conducting our conveyancing in Epping has forwarded documents to review that state the property is unregistered with epitome documents. How can it be that the property not registred at HMLR?
Whilst most properties in Epping are now registered with HMLR there are still a few that are unregistered. Any property in Epping that has been purchased since the late 1980’s will have been registered at the HMLR under the compulsory ‘first registration’ scheme. However, if a Epping property has not changed hands in that time then it’s likely the old fashioned title deeds will be the only evidence of ownership.Many Epping conveyancing solicitors should be able to handle this type of conveyancing but where uncertainty exists the usual proposition these days seems to be for the current owners to address the registration formalities first and thereafter sell - this will predictably result in a drawn-out conveyancing.