Looking for information about your firm's panel status?
ModaMortgages Solicitor Panel: Recently Asked Questions
Is it the case that the Law Society has advised that firms check their status on the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel?
The Scottish Law Society has advised that solicitors should check their lender panel status prior to accepting client instructions to act. The advice is lender-agnostic as it does not relate specifically to solicitors on the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel. The recommendation arises from the practice of a number of mortgage lenders who remove solicitors from their panels without prior notice as part of their panel management system, which can lead to some solicitors discovering this only once instructed. This is sensible advice as a client finding out midway through a transaction that their lawyer is not on the approved lender panel is very frustrating and can lead to complaints. Many online consumer forums contain posts where someone is complaining about finding that their lawyer is not on a lender conveyancing panel. Such forums include mumsnet.com
Theoretically ModaMortgages could request or audit my files as I am on the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel. What do I do if I receive such a request?
We can't comment specifically on
ModaMortgages. Many major lenders are now introducing ‘file auditing’ as standard practice in relation to completed matters. This raises questions of confidentiality in relation to the borrower and the purpose to which the results of such audits will be put. The starting point is to remember that the file does not belong to your firm, it belongs to the ‘client’. But, of course, we will normally have two clients – the buyer and the lender - and you will owe a duty of confidentiality to each. So basically, you have to separate the file and just send the lender the parts solely relating to themselves. But, of course, as this will basically be correspondence with the lender, mortgage instructions etc.
Check with your COLP but a firm should not send the complete conveyancing file without the buyer client’s express consent – and if he is in dispute with the lender she is hardly likely to agree. However, if the lender can establish a prima facie case of fraud, then you may be under an obligation to disclose the whole file.
The emerging convention is that lenders are including an authority to disclose in loan application forms to counter this problem. Mortgage Express v Sawali, [2010] EWHC 3054 (Ch) indicates that such provisions are valid. Please click here for more information about that case.
My PI renewal application this year contained the following question: ‘Has your Firm been asked by a lender to agree to more onerous terms and conditions than provided for in the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook?’ My firm is on a number of lender panels including the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel. We have Terms and Conditions of appointment which we are duty bound to comply with. Should I reference these Conditions ?
The concern here is if you are expect to enter into ‘more onerous’ conditions that than the Handbook obligations.
You have to try and take an objective view as to whether the Terms relating to the
ModaMortgages conveyancing appointment (or other terms for other lenders) are ‘more onerous’ than the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook Conditions. Depending on the Terms you may need to provide details on your renewal form. If you are in any doubt please call your broker to discuss before moving forward on this question.
We are acting for a seller of a property and we have received a letter from the buyers solicitors who are not on the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel requesting that we undertake to send certain post-completion documents to a law firm on the approved solicitor list for
ModaMortgages. We have not come accross this before. Do we give the undertaking?
You will be aware of the trend in recent years for lenders such as
ModaMortgages to take a much more pro-active approach in relation to the management and make up of their conveyancer panels. The knock on effect of this is that it is more likely that there will be a higher number of cases where a conveyancer is not on the
ModaMortgages panel. The situation that you find yourself in is where your client’s purchaser has his/her own lawyer and
ModaMortgages have appointed a separate lawyer to act on their behalf where the new CML Part 3 requirements apply. Section 11.1 of the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook Part 3 requires
ModaMortgages’s panel solicitor to ‘ ...transfer the mortgage advance directly to the Seller’s conveyancer. The Seller’s conveyancer must be required to hold the mortgage advance on the terms of the required undertaking. The example borrower’s conveyancer’s undertaking letter includes a specific example of the seller’s undertaking’. You should expect to be advised to received the mortgage advance directly from the conveyancing solicitors for
ModaMortgages. You will no doubt be required to undertake directly to
ModaMortgages’s solicitors to discharge any charges secured on the property and to send directly to them the executed transfer and any other documents required to enable us to effect registration. Please remember to carefully consider undertakings in accordance with your firm’s protocol and record them in your undertakings logg. Please remember that as well as this breach of this undertaking having regulatory and compliance implications it’s breach could also result in your firm being removed off the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel.
Do publish figures exists regarding the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel size and the number of conveyancing firms removed from their panel each quarter?
With mortgage companies and conveyancing firms working so closely together it is surprising that there has not been greater demand for the introduction of a bit of transparency regarding not just the figures for the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel but for all bank panel listings
Lockton’s PI Insurance renewal form enquires if my firm had been removed off any mortgage panels in the last year.
I recently discovered that the practice is no longer on the
ModaMortgages conveyancing panel? Is this likely to impact my PII cover?
The best placed professionals to answer this question are your insurance brokers.
The chances are that on the basis that you have not been removed for
fraud or negligence reasons that there will be little or no
impact. The main reason why a firm would be removed off of a lender
panel is due to low volume of conveyancing cases although there may be
a number of criteria for ModaMortgages solicitor panel
membership. Please remember that it is always important that you
complete your insurance forms accurately.
I am on the
ModaMortgages
conveyancing panel and due to complete a purchase within the next week. I dont have a Mortgage Deed for the client to execute.
Who do I contact at ModaMortgages to request substitute deeds?
You should get in touch with ModaMortgages
to obtain standard documents. The CML Handbook includes an express inquiry for banks to enumerate who to contact to obtain standard documents.
ModaMortgages in their Part 2’s state:
You will need to quote the firm’s ModaMortgages conveyancing panel number.
Find a Lawyer on the ModaMortgages Conveyancing Panel
powered by LenderPanel
Average number of days to register title including a charge in favour of ModaMortgages
This information relates to purchase only and not remortgages.
| Year | Days* |
|---|---|
| 2025 | [no data] |
| 2024 | [no data] |
| 2023 | [no data] |
| 2022 | [no data] |
| 2021 | [no data] |
| 2020 | [no data] |
* Data aggregated from sources including COMPLETIONmonitor
Other related topics:
- CQS policy templates and procedures for accredited ModaMortgages Firms
- Draft Report on Title precedent for ModaMortgages borrowers
- Draft Anti Money Laundering PolicyTemplate for ModaMortgages panel firms to consider
- Dealing with Lender Policy Template panel for CQS accredited firms on the ModaMortgages lender panel
- Buy-to-Let help for ModaMortgages
- Consent-to-Let help for ModaMortgages
- Contractor Mortgages with ModaMortgages