Mortgage Company conveyancing panel conditions re Restrictive Covenant Indemnity Insurance

Chelsea BS and Barclays, in common with most lenders, have their own specific instructions when it comes to restrictive covenant indemnity insurance. This page sets out to enlighten property law lawyers on the different lender approved list of panel lawyers where the title for the the property to be mortgaged includes restrictive covenant. Solicitors should still check the CML handbook requirements for each bank, be it Accord, Yorkshire Bank Home Loans or Virgin Money. The information on this page is not focused on restrictive covenant indemnity insurance requirements.

Need help with restrictive covenant indemnity insurance from your lender?


Being a conveyancing practitioner on a mortgage company panel you must enquire whether the property has been built, altered or is currently used in contravention of a restrictive covenant. Lenders such as Chelsea BS, Barclays or Accord rely on you to check that the covenant is not enforceable. If you are unable to issue an unqualified COT to the lender as a result of the risk of enforceability you must ensure (subject to the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook paragraph 5.11.2) that indemnity insurance is in place on completion of the mortgage (see UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook section 9).

Should your investigations reveal proof that the restrictive covenant has been breached and, after having conducted reasonable due diligence, you are satisfied that the title is good and marketable ; you are in a position to submit an unconditional COT to the bank and the breach has remained in existence for more than 20 years unchallenged, then restrictive covenant indemnity insurance will not be mandated by the bank.

Nationwide and Lloyds TSB like many mortgage companies, obligations require that where restrictive covenant indemnity insurance is to be put on risk:

  • your practice must provide a duplicate of the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance to the borrower and explain to the mortgagor why the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy was effected and that a further policy could be mandatory if there is further borrowing against the mortgaged property
  • the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy should be effected without cost to the lender
  • the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy needs to be in favor of the lender and, wherever possible, in favour of the mortgagor and any next owner or lender. Where the borrower will not be protected by the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy, the borrower should be informed accordingly.
  • the minimum level of cover for the policy must meet the requirements for the mortgage company (see UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook Part 2 )
  • your practice is required to disclose to the insurer all relevant information which you have obtained
  • your firm must approve the terms of the restrictive covenant policy on behalf of the lender
  • your firm must explain to the borrower that the borrower will need to adhere to any conditions of the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy and that the mortgagor should notify the lender of any notice or potential claim in relation to the insurance
  • the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy should not incorporate terms that you know would invalidate or compromise the interests of the bank
As to the level of cover for the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy (or for that matter any indemnity insurance), consider the following sampling of Section 9.2 of the Part 2 requirements for lenders:
Lender Requirement
Accord Buy to Let An amount at least equal to the amount of the mortgage advance. Any indemnity insurance policy must protect the borrowers, any successors in title and any mortgagee.
Allied Irish Bank At least the amount of the mortgage advance.
Bank of Scotland The value of the property.
Bank of Scotland Private Not less than the Facility plus 10%.
Bluestone Mortgages An amount at least equal to the total mortgage advance. Any indemnity insurance policy must protect the borrowers, any successors in title and any mortgagee.
Danske Bank The limit of indemnity insurance should be the purchase price or valuation - whichever is higher
GE Money GE Money Home Lending has withdrawn from the UK mortgage market.
Habito Higher of purchase price or valuation
Landbay Partners An amount equal to 100% of the property valuation or purchase price (whichever is greater) plus 10%.
M&S Bank the value of the insurance must be for at least the full value of the property
Molo Finance Buy to Let An amount at least equal to the amount of the mortgage advance. Any indemnity insurance policy must protect the borrowers, any successors in title and any mortgages.
National Counties Building Society An amount at least equal to the mortgage advance.
Nationwide Building Society Purchase Price (valuation if price is at a discount).

Contact Issuing Office for advice on a remortgage
Precise Mortgages 2026

An amount at least equal to 110% of the mortgage valuation.

TSB The value of the property
Royal Bank of Scotland -Natwest One An amount equal to the value of the property.
RBS (One Account) An amount equal to the value of the property.
RBS - Virgin One An amount equal to the value of the property.
Zephyr Mortgages Valuation or purchase price, whichever is higher. The policy must always benefit the borrower and any subsequent owner or mortgagee - the policy must be index linked.

Non lender-specific considerations

The extent of the terms for restrictive covenant indemnity insurance are identified in the policy document. Property lawyers should point the borrower to the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance policy itself. Restrictive Covenant Contingency insurance is designed to afford indemnity in respect of the risks specified in the policy schedule - so you should check any draft to determine that it is in order. The continuance of this non-investment insurance contract is in perpetuity unless the policy says something to the contrary. It is well worth checking that the time frame is correct.

Restrictive Covenant indemnity insurance: Significant features and benefits:

Protection via such a policy is to cover the risk of third parties looking to enforce rights that can affect the use of a property. Restrictive Covenant indemnity insurance Cover normally includes
  • Diminution in value due to the successful enforcement of the risks specified in the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance.
  • All other costs and expenses incurred by the Insured with consent in writing from the relevant insurance company
  • Reimbursement for compensation incurred in any proceedings regarding the risks specified in the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance, as well as legal and associated costs.
  • Expenses for works (including architects’ and surveyors’ fees) for the purpose of the development started, before the commencement of proceedings for the enforcement of the risks specified in the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance, to the extent that such costs are rendered abortive by court order.
  • Money paid with consent in writing from the insurance company to free the property from the risks specified in the restrictive covenant policy.
  • The out of pocket expenses of altering or demolishing all, or part of the development and the reinstatement of the land, insofar as such alteration, demolition or re-instatement is made necessary by court order.

Don't forget to consider what is not included in the restrictive covenant indemnity insurance e.g. does the policy cover any residence that has been altered within the year prior to the policy being put on risk? Are legal costs covered?

Restrictive Covenant Indemnity Insurance has limitations - Additional considerations

Restrictive Covenant Indemnity insurance isn’t a solution to all of the relevant problems.

A good example is an annex may have to be destroyed but indemnity insurance will not recompense for the loss of separate but adjoining accommodation for an elderly relative who needs occasional care. Whilst this is not necessarily of relevance to the lender it my be of importance to your non-lender client.

Information provided on this webpage is for general information for Regulated law firms in England and Wales on the the bank solicitor panel, it does not constitute advice for members of the public who should contact their lawyer for advice relating to the bank indemnity insurance. Whilst we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct we do not make any representation or warranties of any kind about its completeness, accuracy, reliability or suitability. Any reliance you place on the information is strictly at your own risk. Lexsure will not be liable for any direct or indirect loss or damage arising out of or in connection with the use of this information. Do not attempt to contact the person who you think may have the benefit of the restrictive covenant as insurers will almost always invariably refuse to insure if there has been any attempt in this respect. Once you have approached the other party insurance may well become impossible and this would in all likelihood close down indemnity insurance as an option of addressing the restrictive covenant problem.

The content set out above is in relation to properties in England and Wales.