Looking for information about your firm's panel status?
Skipton Building Society Solicitor Panel: Recently Asked Questions
In appealing a decision by Skipton Building Society, it may be useful to provide the following information:
- Comprehensive disclosure of your firm’s conveyancing history
- Your COMPLETIONmonitor reports, assuming you use the Lexsure software
- Your recent claims history
- comprehensive details of all staff in your practice and their role.
- Note down if a solicitor has been admitted to the role on completion of the Qualified Lawyers Transfer Test.
- Provide duplicate practising certificates, the firm's current professional indemnity policy and the firm’s accountant's certificate, calculating the percentage of the firm's gross fee income is generated from residential conveyancing
It is encouraging that some solicitors have been able to regain membership to panels notwithstanding the policy by the respective lenders to refuse panel membership to firms with certain profiles or characteristics. Such an achievement is primarily due to the firms’ ability to persuade the lender to make an exception if there is sufficient evidence to reassure them that the firm is well risk-managed.
These risks are exacerbated by the lack of a comprehensive set of data on all conveyancing firms (which, for the avoidance of doubt, would include solicitors and conveyancers across the UK) which is in a readily accessible format. Currently, lenders vet the suitability of their panel firms against a variety of disparate, incomplete and potentially inaccurate sets of information. One top 5 lender pointed out to us that it is almost impossible to track individual fraudsters who move from firm to firm, especially where they are no longer registered or no longer hold a valid practicing certificate.
Skipton Building Society and other lenders are in varying stages of reviewing their approach to vetting firms on their conveyancing panels, to ensure their ongoing exposure to unsuitable firms is reduced. There is also regulatory impetus on lenders to ensure that they have satisfactory oversight of their third party panels, including a due-diligence process.
Check with your COLP but a firm should not send the complete conveyancing file without the buyer client’s express consent – and if she is in dispute with the lender he is hardly likely to agree. However, if the lender can establish a prima facie case of fraud, then you may be under an obligation to disclose the whole file.
The emerging convention is that lenders are including an authority to disclose in loan application forms to counter this problem. Mortgage Express v Sawali, [2010] EWHC 3054 (Ch) indicates that such provisions are valid. Please click here for more information about that case.
Remember: CML requirements are not guidelines; they are the lender client’s instructions.
Find a Lawyer on the Skipton Building Society Solicitor Panel
powered by LenderPanel
| Year | Days* |
|---|---|
| 2026 | [no data] |
| 2025 | [no data] |
| 2024 | [no data] |
| 2023 | [no data] |
| 2022 | [no data] |
| 2021 | [no data] |
Other related topics:
- CQS policy templates and procedures for accredited Skipton Building Society Firms
- Draft Report on Title precedent for Skipton Building Society borrowers
- Draft Anti Money Laundering PolicyTemplate for Skipton Building Society panel firms to consider
- Dealing with Lender Policy Template panel for CQS accredited firms on the Skipton Building Society lender panel
- Buy-to-Let help for Skipton Building Society
- Consent-to-Let help for Skipton Building Society
- Contractor Mortgages with Skipton Building Society