My wife and I are buying a 3 bedroom flat in Orpington with a mortgage. We like our Orpington lawyer, but the bank advise he's not on their "panel". It appears that we have little choice but to instruct one of the bank panel solicitors or keep our Orpington property lawyer as well as pay for one of their panel ones to represent them. This seems very unfair; is there anything we can do?
No, not really. Your mortgage offer is subject to its terms and conditions, one of which will be that lawyers will on the lender’s conveyancing panel. Until recently, most lenders had large numbers of law firms on their panels: a borrower could choose one for themselves, as long as it was on the lender's panel. The lender would then simply instruct the borrower's lawyers to act for the lender, too. You can use your lender's panel lawyers or you could borrow from another lender which does not restrict your choice. A further alternative is for your Orpington conveyancing solicitor to apply to be on the conveyancing panel.
My partner and I are purchasing a brand new flat in Orpington and my solicitor is telling me that she is duty bound to the lender to reveal incentives from the builder. The Estate Agents are hassling me to exchange and I don't want to delay deal. Is my lawyer right?
You should not exchange unless you have been advised to do so by your property lawyer. A precondition to being on a mortgage company panel is to comply with the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook specifications. The CML Conveyancing Handbook requires that your lawyer have the appropriate Disclosure of Incentive form completed by the developer and accepted by your lender.
we are a couple who decided to purchase a 3 bedroom apartment in Orpington with a homeloan from Lloyds TSB Bank.We use our Orpington conveyancing solicitor but Lloyds TSB Bank informed us he's not on their "panel". It seems we are left with little choice but to instruct a Lloyds TSB Bank panel solicitor or keep our local solicitor and fork out for one of their panel ones to act for them. We feel as though this is unjust; Can we not simply insist that Lloyds TSB Bank use our lawyer?
Unfortunately,no. The mortgage offered to you contains terms and conditions, one of which will be that conveyancers must be on the Lloyds TSB Bank conveyancing panel. in the past, most banks had large numbers of law firms on their panels: a borrower could find one for themselves, as long as it was on the lender's panel. The lender would then simply instruct the borrower's lawyers to act for the lender, too. You can use your lender's panel lawyers or you could borrow from another lender which does not restrict your choice. Another option that might be available is for your lawyer to apply to be on the conveyancing panel for Lloyds TSB Bank
My step-father has recommend that I use his conveyancers in Orpington. Should I use them?
No doubt the best way to choose a conveyancing lawyer is to have referrals from friends or family who have actually used the conveyancer you're are thinking of instructing.
There are only Fifty years unexpired on my lease in Orpington. I need to get lease extension but my freeholder is absent. What options are available to me?
On the basis that you meet the appropriate requirements, under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 you can submit an application to the County Court for an order to dispense with the service of the initial notice. This will enable the lease to be extended by the magistrate. You will be obliged to prove that you or your lawyers have made all reasonable attempts to find the landlord. For most situations a specialist would be useful to conduct investigations and to produce an expert document which can be used as evidence that the freeholder can not be located. It is advisable to get professional help from a solicitor in relation to proving the landlord’s absence and the application to the County Court covering Orpington.
Following months of dialogue we simply can't agree with our landlord on how much the lease extension should cost for our flat in Orpington. Does the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal have jurisdiction to calculate the appropriate figures?
Where there is a absentee freeholder or where there is disagreement about what the lease extension should cost, under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 it is possible to make an application to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to arrive at the premium.
An example of a Lease Extension matter before the tribunal for a Orpington property is 1 Southlands Court Southlands Road in September 2013. The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal determined that the premium to be paid by the tenant on the grant of a new lease, in accordance with section 56 and Schedule 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was £30,541 This case was in relation to 1 flat. The unexpired term as at the valuation date was 50.57 years.
What range of conveyancing matters do Orpington conveyancing practices undertake?
The majority of Orpington conveyancing practices manage to provide a number of services to residential and agricultural land proprietors, sellers, first time buyers, freeholders and leaseholders helping outwith some of the following:
-
Property sale conveyancing in Orpington or nationally
Domestic purchase conveyancing in Orpington and throughout England and Wales
Advising in relation to rights of drainage, services, and access (Easements) All property dispute issues including rights of way and boundary disputes Advising on buy to let and other investment property transactions Buying and selling of garden land