Me and my fiance are buying a 1 bedroom flat in Watton with a mortgage. We wish to retain our Watton conveyancer, however the mortgage company advise she’s not on their "panel". It appears that we have little option but to select one of the bank panel solicitors or continue with our Watton solicitor and pay for one of their panel firms to act for them. This seems very unfair; are we not able to insist that the lender use our Watton solicitor ?
Unfortunately,no. Your mortgage offer is subject to its terms and conditions, one of which will be that lawyers will on the lender’s conveyancing panel. Until recently, most lenders had large numbers of law firms on their panels: a borrower could choose one for themselves, as long as it was on the lender's panel. The lender would then simply instruct the borrower's lawyers to act for the lender, too. You can use your lender's panel lawyers or you could borrow from another lender which does not restrict your choice. Another option that might be available is for your Watton conveyancing lawyer to apply to be on the conveyancing panel.
What happens if my lawyer’s firm is expelled from the Skipton Conveyancing panel ahead of completing my conveyancing in Watton?
The first thing to point out is that, this is very unlikely to happen. In most cases even where a law firm is removed off of a panel the lender would allow the completion to go ahead as the lender would appreciate the difficulties that they would place you in if you have to instruct a new solicitor days before completion. In a worst case scenario where the lender insists that you instruct a new firm then it is possible for a very good lawyer to expedite the conveyancing albeit that you may pay a significant premium for this. The analogous situation is where a buyer instructs a lawyer, exchanges contracts and the law firm is shut down by a regulator such as the SRA. Again, in this situation you can find lawyers who can troubleshoot their way to bring the conveyancing to a satisfactory conclusion - albeit at a cost.
I have recentlyfound out that Stirling Law have closed. They conducted my conveyancing in Watton for a purchase of a freehold house 18 months ago. How can I check that my home is in my name in the name of the former proprietor?
The easiest method to check if the property is in your name, you can make a search of the land registry (£3.00). You can either do this yourself or ask a law firm to do this for you. If you are not registered you can seek help from one of a number of Watton conveyancing specialists.
Due to the encouragement of my in-laws I had a survey completed on a house in Watton ahead of appointing conveyancers. I have been told that there is a flying freehold element to the house. The surveyor advised that some lenders may not grant a mortgage on such a premises.
It depends who your proposed lender is. HSBC has different instructions for example to Nationwide. If you e-mail us we can check via the relevant mortgage company. If you lender is happy to lend one our lawyers can assist as they are accustomed to dealing with flying freeholds in Watton. Conveyancing will be smoother if you use a solicitor in Watton especially if they are acquainted with such properties in Watton.
I need to retain a conveyancing solicitor for some conveyancing in Watton. I have land on a site which appears to be the perfect solution If it is possible to get all this stuff done via email that would be preferable. Do I need to be concerned? What are the potential pitfalls?
As usual with these online conveyancers you need to read ALL the small print - did you notice the extra charge for dealing with the mortgage?
I am attracted to a two apartments in Watton both have approximately forty five years left on the lease term. Should I regard a short lease as a deal breaker?
There are no two ways about it. A leasehold apartment in Watton is a wasting asset as a result of the reducing lease term. The closer the lease gets to zero years unexpired, the more it adversely affects the marketability of the property. For most buyers and mortgage companies, leases with less than 75 years become less and less attractive. On a more positive note, leaseholders can extend their leases by serving a Section 42 Notice. One stipulation is that they must have owned the property for two years (unlike a Section 13 notice for purchasing the freehold, when leaseholders can participate from day one of ownership). When successful, they will have the right to an extension of 90 years to the current term and ground rent is effectively reduced to zero. Before moving forward with a purchase of a property with a short lease term remaining you should talk to a solicitor specialising in lease extensions and leasehold enfranchisement. We are are happy to put you in touch with Watton conveyancing experts who will explain the options available to you during an initial telephone conversation free of charge. More often than not it is possible to negotiate informally with the freeholder to extend the lease. You may find he or she is happy to negotiate informally and willing to consider your offer straight off, without having to involve anyone else. This will save you time and money and it could help you reach a lower price on the lease. You need to ensure that any new terms represent good long-term value compared with the standard benefits of the Section 42 Notice and that onerous clauses are not inserted into any redrafting of the lease.
Leasehold Conveyancing in Watton - Examples of Questions you should consider Prior to buying
-
How long is the Lease? It is important to be aware whether window replacement or some other significant cost is due in the near future to be shared by the leasehold owners and may well dramatically increase the the service fees or result in a one time invoice. The answer will be useful as a) areas can cause problems for the building as the common areas may start to deteriorate where services remain unpaid b) if the tenants have an issue with the managing agents you will need to have all the details