Coutts Finance Conveyancing Panel Information

The criteria to join the Coutts Finance conveyancing panel is likely to be fairly detailed and is unlikely to include signing up to LENDERmonitor alerts.

Many estate agents are feeling the pain if their clients start out on the conveyancing process using a conveyancer who is not on the panel with the purchaser’s chosen lender. Many conveyancing firms are only discovering when they begin working on a case that they are no longer able to work with that lender. Given the inevitable resultant delays in the transaction the chances of an abortive deal increases dramatically. in the circumstances there is understandable anguish on the part of the estate agent as a result of the lost time should the client have to change lawyers.

In operating open conveyancing panels, lenders such as Coutts Finance face a number of fraud and negligence risks. While there is no authoritative source of data on lender exposure to solicitor–led mortgage fraud, anecdotal evidence from lenders indicates exposure on individual cases are often in the millions of pounds. The National Fraud Authority estimates that £1bn per year is lost in mortgage -related frauds in total, which is seen as a conservative estimate.

These risks are exacerbated by the lack of a comprehensive set of data on all conveyancing firms (which, for the avoidance of doubt, would include solicitors and conveyancers across the UK) which is in a readily accessible format. Currently, lenders vet the suitability of their panel firms against a variety of disparate, incomplete and potentially inaccurate sets of information. One top 5 lender pointed out to us that it is almost impossible to track individual fraudsters who move from firm to firm, especially where they are no longer registered or no longer hold a valid practicing certificate.

Coutts Finance and other lenders are in varying stages of reviewing their approach to vetting firms on their conveyancing panels, to ensure their ongoing exposure to unsuitable firms is reduced. There is also regulatory impetus on lenders to ensure that they have satisfactory oversight of their third party panels, including a due-diligence process.

You might expect Coutts Finance via their Part 2 requirements to address this but the Handbook is silent on time frames. Do look at the Terms of Coutts Finance’s Conveyancing Panel Appointment that you previously signed. For many lender's these Terms have a provision along the following lines: ‘To keep us informed of the reasons for any delay in your being able to send the title deeds and documents we require to us within 3 months of completion or evidence of proof of registration within that period. (We will send reminders if the deeds have not been received but will not acknowledge receipt of deeds’ It is imperative to keep Coutts Finance updated. Law firms can often compound their problems by not communicating with the lender when there is a delay or problem.

Your insurance brokers are your best port of call to address this question. The chances are that on the basis that you have not been removed for fraud or negligence reasons that there will be little or no impact. The main reason why a firm would be removed off of a lender panel is due to low volume of conveyancing cases although there may be a number of criteria for Coutts Finance solicitor panel membership. Please remember that it is always important that you complete your insurance forms accurately.

You would be advised to communicate with Coutts Finance to obtain standard documents. The CML Handbook has a specific question for lenders to reveal who to contact to obtain standard documents. Coutts Finance in their Part 2’s state: Please remember to disclose the firm’s Coutts Finance solicitors panel reference.