Precise Mortgages Conveyancing Panel Information

The information on this page is designed to keep solicitors and licensed conveyancers abreast of latest requirements changes by Precise Mortgages and to assist in remaining on the Precise Mortgages Solicitors Panel.

Precise Mortgages Conveyancing Panel: Recently Asked Questions

Do the Council of Mortgage Lenders intend to launch a searchable register search tool with a view to list law firms on the Precise Mortgages conveyancing panel?
We are not aware of any intention on the part of the CML to develop such a tool.

Read More

A recent SRA survey reveals that 76% of solicitors have been removed from a lender conveyancing panel. Precise Mortgages and other lenders have restricted their panel over the years. Why?
In operating open conveyancing panels, lenders such as Precise Mortgages face a number of fraud and negligence risks. While there is no authoritative source of data on lender exposure to solicitor–led mortgage fraud, anecdotal evidence from lenders indicates exposure on individual cases are often in the millions of pounds. The National Fraud Authority estimates that £1bn per year is lost in mortgage -related frauds in total, which is seen as a conservative estimate.

These risks are exacerbated by the lack of a comprehensive set of data on all conveyancing firms (which, for the avoidance of doubt, would include solicitors and conveyancers across the UK) which is in a readily accessible format. Currently, lenders vet the suitability of their panel firms against a variety of disparate, incomplete and potentially inaccurate sets of information. One top 5 lender pointed out to us that it is almost impossible to track individual fraudsters who move from firm to firm, especially where they are no longer registered or no longer hold a valid practicing certificate.

Precise Mortgages and other lenders are in varying stages of reviewing their approach to vetting firms on their conveyancing panels, to ensure their ongoing exposure to unsuitable firms is reduced. There is also regulatory impetus on lenders to ensure that they have satisfactory oversight of their third party panels, including a due-diligence process.

My PI renewal application this year contained the following question: ‘Has your Firm been asked by a lender to agree to more onerous terms and conditions than provided for in the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook?’ My firm is on numerous approved panels including the Precise Mortgages conveyancing panel. We have Terms and Conditions of appointment which we have to follow. Should I reference these Conditions ?
The concern here is if you are expect to enter into ‘more onerous’ conditions that than the Handbook obligations. You have to try and take an objective view as to whether the Terms relating to the Precise Mortgages conveyancing appointment (or other terms for other lenders) are ‘more onerous’ than the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook Conditions. Depending on the Terms you may need to provide details on your renewal form. If you are in any doubt please call your broker to discuss before completing the answer.
My firm is representing a seller of a property and we have just received an email from the buyers solicitors who are not on the Precise Mortgages conveyancing panel requesting that we undertake to send certain post-completion documents to a law firm on the approved solicitor list for Precise Mortgages. How has this come about?
You will be aware of the trend in recent years for lenders such as Precise Mortgages to take a much more pro-active approach in relation to the management and make up of their conveyancer panels. The knock on effect of this is that it is more likely that there will be a higher number of cases where a conveyancer is not on the Precise Mortgages panel. The situation that you find yourself in is where your client’s purchaser has his/her own lawyer and Precise Mortgages have appointed a separate lawyer to act on their behalf where the new CML Part 3 requirements apply. Section 11.1 of the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook Part 3 requires Precise Mortgages’s panel solicitor to ‘ ...transfer the mortgage advance directly to the Seller’s conveyancer. The Seller’s conveyancer must be required to hold the mortgage advance on the terms of the required undertaking. The example borrower’s conveyancer’s undertaking letter includes a specific example of the seller’s undertaking’. You should expect to be advised to received the mortgage advance directly from the conveyancing solicitors for Precise Mortgages. You will no doubt be required to undertake directly to Precise Mortgages’s solicitors to discharge any charges secured on the property and to send directly to them the executed transfer and any other documents required to enable us to effect registration. Please remember to carefully consider undertakings in accordance with your firm’s protocol and record them in your undertakings logg. Please remember that as well as this breach of this undertaking having regulatory and compliance implications it’s breach could also result in your firm being removed off the Precise Mortgages conveyancing panel.
My conveyancing assistant has left my firm unexpectedly. I urgently need to prioritise making sure that charges are registered. That said, how quickly do I need to send deeds to Precise Mortgages once the charge is registered before my firm runs the risk of being suspended off the conveyancing panel for Precise Mortgages?
Precise Mortgages will likely expect the deeds to be sent to them within 10 days of you receiving the TID (unless their specific P2 requirements specifically state that they you are not to send them anything). Most COTs refer to complying with the Certificate of Title referred to in IB (3.7) of the SRA Code of Conduct 2011, published by the Law Society which states that you ‘will despatch to you such deeds and documents relating to the Property as you require with a list of them in the form prescribed by you within ten working days of receipt by us of the title information document from the Land Registry’ As to whether the lender will suspend your panel status this very much varies according to the lender’s own internal policies The more cases you have the more risk you face. Some lenders may take action if there records show that the deeds are outstanding for more than 3 matters. The fact is that if you keep within the time frame then you will have more chance of remaining on the Precise Mortgages conveyancing panel.
My firm has just been advised that it’s Precise Mortgages panel membership terminated but we have not yet been given a reason as to why. I am completing a CQS application form what details must I report?
In this situation please explain on the form what action you have taken to find out the reasons behind cancellation of your Precise Mortgages panel status. In particular please provide details if you have received communications from the lender. E.G. before termination of your panel membership did you receive any letters or calls from the lender advising you as to their reasons?
My firm is listed on the Precise Mortgages conveyancing panel and all set to complete a purchase within the next week. My papers do not include a Legal Charge for the client to execute. Who do I contact at Precise Mortgages to obtain duplicate documents?
You should get in touch with Precise Mortgages to obtain standard documents. The The Council of Mortgage Lenders Handbook incorporates a specific question for banks to cite who to contact to obtain standard documents. Precise Mortgages in their Part 2’s state:
Always remember to disclose the firm’s Precise Mortgages solicitors panel number.

Find a Lawyer on the Precise Mortgages Solicitors Panel

powered by LenderPanel

Average number of days to register title including a charge in favour of Precise Mortgages
This information relates to purchase only and not remortgages.
YearDays*
2025 [no data]
2024 [no data]
2023 [no data]
2022 [no data]
2021 [no data]
2020 [no data]
* Data aggregated from sources including COMPLETIONmonitor