We are buying a 1 bedroom apartment in Burnt Oak with a mortgage. We would like to retain our Burnt Oak solicitor, however the mortgage company says she’s not on their "panel". It seems we have no choice but to instruct one of the lender panel solicitors or keep our Burnt Oak lawyer and pay for one of their panel lawyers to act for them. We consider that this is inequitable; are we not able to insist that the bank use our Burnt Oak lawyer ?
Unfortunately,no. The mortgage offered to you is subject to its terms and conditions, one of which will be that lawyers will on the lender’s conveyancing panel. Until recently, most lenders had large numbers of law firms on their panels: a borrower could choose one for themselves, as long as it was on the lender's panel. The lender would then simply instruct the borrower's lawyers to act for the lender, too. You can use your lender's panel lawyers or you could borrow from another lender which does not restrict your choice. A further alternative is for your Burnt Oak conveyancing solicitor to apply to be on the conveyancing panel.
I sincerely hope you can help me. My Burnt Oak lawyer is informing me me that he is legally obliged toorder Burnt Oak conveyancing searches becausethe firm are on the Virgin Moneysolicitor panel. These Burnt Oak searches cost a lot of money can this be avoided?
Unfortunately both you and your lawyer have little choice here. As you are taking a mortgage with a bank your lawyer has to comply with their conditions as set out in their version of the CML Conveyancing Handbook. Your lawyer would have previously signed the Terms and Conditions of your bank’s conveyancing panel appointment which obliges them to comply with the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook specifications . Even if you were a cash buyer you would be ill advised not to carry out Burnt Oak conveyancing searches.
I have a decision in principle. The bank mentioned the home loan came with free conveyancing. Is the implication that I have to instruct their panel lawyer as I would much rather appoint a local conveyancing solicitor in Burnt Oak?
You should check but the the likelihood is that appoint one of their panel lawyers should you accept the "fee-free" deal. Speak to the mortgage company and determine if they make available a monetary alternative. In the past a few lenders offered a £250 cashback as an alternative in which case you could put that amount towards your preferred conveyancing solicitor in Burnt Oak.
A relative informed me that in purchasing a property in Burnt Oak there may be various restrictions preventing external alterations to a property. Is this right?
There are a number of properties in Burnt Oak which have some sort of restriction or requirement of consent to carry out external changes. Part of the conveyancing in Burnt Oak should determine what restrictions are applicable and advising you as part of a ROT that should be sent to you.
I am the only recipient of my late grandmother’s estate and I have everything in my name alone, including the house in Burnt Oak. Conveyancing formalities meant that the Land Registry date was in August. I now wish to sell up. I do know about the CML six month 'rule', which means that my property ownership will be regarded the same way as though I had purchased the house in August. Is the property unsalable for six months?
The CML handbook obliges conveyancers to: "report to us immediately if the owner or registered proprietor has been registered for less than six months." By the strict wording you could be affected by that. How sensible a view lenders take of it, depend on the bank as this obligation is principally there to pick up on subsales or the flipping of property.
My wife and I are at the point of viewing houses in Burnt Oak and I am about to put in an offer. Should I already have a solicitor in place at this stage? I intend to finance via a mortgage with Kent Reliance.
It would be advisable to instigate your search sooner rather than later. After you have chosen your lawyer and once your offer is accepted you can instruct them to work for you and forward their contact information on to the selling agent. Given that you are taking out a mortgage with Kent Reliance, make sure you remember to check that your lawyer is on the Kent Reliance conveyancing panel.
Just had an offer accepted on a new build apartment in Burnt Oak. Conveyancing is a frightening process at the best of times but I have never purchased a new build flat before. Can you give me some examples of some of the questions asked in new build legal work.
Here are examples of a selection of leasehold new build questions that you should expect your new-build leasehold conveyancing in Burnt Oak
-
Investor purchasers must be able to freely grant unsecured tenancies at market rents without requiring any consents. There must be mutual enforceability of lessee’s covenants. Has the Lease plan been approved by the Land Registry and if not when will they be lodged for this purpose? Please supply a car parking plan. The Vendor must covenant to keep unsold units in good repair until long leases are granted therefore.
Can you offer any advice when it comes to choosing a Burnt Oak conveyancing firm to deal with our lease extension?
If you are instructing a property lawyer for your lease extension (regardless if they are a Burnt Oak conveyancing practice) it is imperative that he or she should be familiar with the legislation and specialises in this area of work. We advise that you make enquires with several firms including non Burnt Oak conveyancing practices prior to instructing a firm. If the firm is ALEP accredited then that’s a bonus. The following questions could be helpful:
-
Can they put you in touch with clients in Burnt Oak who can give a testimonial?
I have given up trying to reach an agreement for a lease extension in Burnt Oak. Can the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal adjudicate on premiums?
if there is a missing freeholder or if there is disagreement about what the lease extension should cost, under the relevant statutes you can apply to the LVT to decide the premium.
An example of a Lease Extension decision for a Burnt Oak residence is 20 Orchard Court Stonegrove in June 2009. The tribunal decided that a premium of £11,040 should be payable for the new lease This case affected 1 flat. The remaining number of years on the lease was 71.55 years.