Am I correct in assuming that the fact that my solicitor in Barnes is not listed on my bank's conveyancing panel that there is a problem with the standard of her work?
It would be unwise to jump to that conclusion. There are plenty of plausible explanations. Just recently a report by the solicitors regulator indicated 76% of law firms surveyed had been removed from at least one lender panel. The most common reasons for removal are: (1) low volume of transactions (2) the lawyer is a sole practitioner (3) as part of the HSBC panel reduction (4) regulatory contact by SRA (5) accidental removal. Should you be concerned you should simply call the Barnes conveyancing firm and enquire why they are no longer on the approved list for your lender.
Are the Barnes conveyancing solicitors identified as being on the Aldermore conveyancing panel, together with their details provided by Aldermore?
Barnes conveyancing firms themselves provide us confirmation that they are on the Aldermore conveyancing panel as opposed to being supplied with a list from Aldermore directly.
Are the BSA planning on creating a online directory to to identify practices on the Loughborough BS conveyancing panel for example in Barnes?
We have not been informed any intention on the part of the BSA to promote such a register.
Can you point me to a directory of Clydesdale panel conveyancers in Barnes on the Building Society Association’s Website?
Unfortunately not yet. There is no such tool on the CML or Building Society Association sites. Very few lending institutions make their panel listings available over the internet. If you are in need of a Barnes conveyancer on the Clydesdale please make the most of our tool.
Is it the case that all Barnes solicitor firms on the Principality conveyancing panel are overseen by the SRA?
As a firm of solicitors, in order to be on the Principality approved list of solicitors they would need to be overseen by the SRA. Many banks do list licenced conveyancers on their panel in which case such practice would be regulated by the Council of Licensed Conveyancers.
I recently had an offer accepted on a house in Barnes. My financial adviser suggested a solicitor. I paid an on account payment of £225. Shortly after, the conveyancer contacted me embarrassingly acknowledging that they were not on the Barclays conveyancing panel. Am I right in thinking that I should be due a refund?
You should be able to recover this from the law firm if they were not on the Barclays panel. They should have asked at the outset which lender you were obtaining a mortgage with. An important lesson to readers of this site is to check that the lawyers are on the appropriate lender panel.
I have had difficulty in trying to purchase the freehold in Barnes. Can this matter be resolved via the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal?
if there is a absentee freeholder or if there is dispute about the premium for a lease extension, under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 it is possible to make an application to the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal to make a decision on the premium.
An example of a Freehold Enfranchisement case for a Barnes premises is 25 Petley Road in February 2010. The Tribunal determined that the price payable for the freehold of the subject premises should be £18,760. This case related to 2 flats. The remaining number of years on the lease was 156.6 years and 66.6 years.
Are there frequently found problems that you encounter in leases for Barnes properties?
There is nothing unique about leasehold conveyancing in Barnes. Most leases are drafted differently and drafting errors can sometimes mean that certain clauses are erroneous. For example, if your lease is missing any of the following, it could be defective:
-
Maintenance charge proportions which don’t add up to the correct percentage A provision for the recovery of money spent for the benefit of another party.
You will have difficulties when selling your property if you have a defective lease as they can affect a potential buyer’s ability to obtain a mortgage. Birmingham Midshires, The Royal Bank of Scotland, and Clydesdale all have very detailed conveyancing instructions when it comes to what is expected in a lease. If a mortgage lender believes that the lease does not cover certain provisions they may refuse to provide security, obliging the purchaser to withdraw.
We own a leasehold flat in Barnes. Conveyancing was finalised in five years ago. I have been told that I mustn’t allow the lease length fall too low. What is the reasoning?
Barnes leasehold properties are for a prescribed period - normally just under one hundred years when they started. However many appartments in Barnes were constructed or converted in the 70’s80’s and so these leases now have under 80 years unexpired. This may seem like a long time however Banks, Building Societies and other mortgage institutions on the whole need leases to have a minimum of seventy five years remaining to adequate security. This means that when you come to sell the property you will need a lease extension if you are nearing eighty years. To enhance your property value you should be considering whether or not to extend your lease long before you come to sell it. Furthermore advantages to doing so before the lease hits 80 years as when the lease is below 80 years the amount you have to pay to extend starts to escalate.